(Your Voice in a World where Zionism, Steel, and Fire have
turned Justice Mute)

New Manual of Terror


                                                         By Nabila Harb\FAV

A new 35 page Manual of Terror is the latest development in the sphere of
international terrorism.  This 35 page manual is the work of George W. Bush,
current President of the United States.  It unequivocally delineates a new
U.S. foreign policy,  declaring a unilateral U.S. right to engage in pre-emptive
terrorist strikes against any nation, group or individual who opposes U.S.
foreign policy.  Bush declared that the United States will stop any adversary
challenging America's military superiority and adopt a strike-first policy
against terrorist threats 'before they're fully formed.'  Obviously, a challenge
to U.S. military superiority does not a terrorist make, and in effect, this new
strategy will allow Bush to turn against his own supposed allies, should they
dare to improve their military capacity in an effort to balance international
power.

In his terrorist manual, disguised by the title 'The National Security Strategy
of the United States of America,  Bush wrote that:
   'Given the goals of rogue states and terrorists, the United States can no
   longer solely rely on a reactive posture as we have in the past. ... We
   cannot let our enemies strike first.'
He added that:
   'As a matter of common sense and self-defense, America will act against
   such emerging threats before they are fully formed.'

Note the key phrase, 'before they are fully formed.'  In other words, an
actual threat to U.S. official 'interests' or U.S. foreign policy is not a
prerequisite.  The possibility that future opposition to U.S. policy may exist
is enough.  This doctrine could be used to  justify a State-sponsored programme
of infanticide, defining the children of potential adult enemies to be potential
threats as well, and therefore subject to pre-emptive elimination.  To those who
might argue that this is an absurd example, one need only say that the entire
philosophy embodied in Bush's terrorist manual is absurd.

The manual gives the U.S. the unilateral power to decide what is 'best' for
the world by declaring that:
   'While the United States will constantly strive to enlist the support of
   the international community, we will not hesitate to act alone, if necessary,
   to exercise our right of self-defense by acting pre-emptively against such
   terrorists to prevent them from doing harm against our people and our country.'

The document asserts U.S. global military superiority, and states that:
   'Our forces will be strong enough to dissuade potential adversaries from
   pursuing a military build-up in hopes of surpassing or equaling the power
   of the United States.'

Zionist-American spokeman for Bush, Ari Feischer declared that:
   'What the world has seen in the 20th century is a benevolent America
   that uses its strength for good around the world.'
Examples of American 'benevolence' in the real world included the murder of the
Libyan President's infant daughter, the death of over 6 million Iraqi children
due to over a decade of sanctions, the bombing of the aspirin-producing Al Shifa
factory in Sudan and the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan (involving numerous
bombings of Red Cross facilities and indiscriminate murder of civilians).
Of course, death by 'friendly fire' is defined as a simple 'mistake'.  (After
all, those towelheads all look alike.)  All of this examples of U.S. benevolence
took place in the last decade or two of the 20th century.  One does not want
to even contemplate the enormous weight of U.S. benevolence in the Vietnam War
and other U.S. interference prior to the Gulf War.

Put simply, Bush's manual makes it clear that the U.S. bully boy will not
tolerate any potential challengers on the playground, either from schoolmates
or from authority figures.  In classical American gangster fashion,  the U.S.
no doubt will demand a hefty amount of 'protection money' in return for a
conditional promise not to turn its destructive attentions towards all and sundry.

One member of Congress declared that Bush had a 'political personality
disorder'.  It is undoubtedly a catchy phrase, but unfortunately, it would
be a mistake to suppose that Bush's strategies are anything but part of a
coldly, carefully calculated programme to strip the nation and the world of
any power to interfere in his goals.  Another member of Congress spoke of
'the gall and the arrogance of the White House in requesting such a broad
grant of war powers', pointing out the fact that his new policy would 'allow
the president to march our troops into Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, the West
Bank, and anywhere else that one could argue is part of the Middle East.'
This statement, however, fails to grasp the truly global nature of Bush's
ambitions, which are not confined to the Arab Nation, but target the entire
world.   After all, Bush's definition of his illusory 'evil axis' as Iran,
Syria and Korea basically made it clear that the Arab Nation is not the only
potential victim of his abuse.   In any case, it is probable that Bush will
ignore any domestic opposition in the same manner in which he has declared
an intention to ignore any international opposition to his schemes.

This is organised terrorism at its very worst.  It is clear that any one who
comes between Bush and his goals will be flattened if he has anything to say
about it.  The history of the human race, however,  has shown that bullies
usually cannot maintain the illusion of superior power in the face of determined
opposition.  So: What are we (the nation and world both collectively and
individually) going to do about it?   Here is the only 'leader'  who truly
possesses vast quantities of real 'weapons of mass destruction'  with a clear
determination to use them against any one who dares to stand in his way.
Unity in opposition is the only sane course of action, both domestically and
internationally.  In the U.S., Republicans and Democrats alike must stand
together against this Executive bid for dictatorship.  Internationally,
leaders of every nation on every continent must unite to prevent Bush's
'brave new world' from achieving any reality.  To paraphrase this megalomaniac,
the world must act against this 'emerging threat before it is fully formed.'
Otherwise, it will be too late.